Sunday 26 May 2024

Could plants be shaped 'webbed' instead of 'branched' ? (Alien Plants VIII, Tabulae mortuae VI, Archives XVI)

 There are at least three clades of plants with different photosynthetic pigments on Furaha. While having leaves that are not green creates some 'otherworldliness', the shape of these plants is the one we know well: a stem with branches and leaves. At one time, some Furahan plants had enormous sail-like leaves. Unfortunately, reading about wind stresses on plants made me realise why Earth plants do not have sails or giant parasols for leaves. They are poor engineering, as giant leaves would suffer from wind damage (see here for what it takes to get large leaves). With some regret on my part, giant leaves followed ballonts (see here) on their way to the Forbidden Vault.

Even so, I always felt I should do more with plants and will share some ideas here. I find mangrove forests fascinating: plants, standing in salt seawater, form a barrier against waves and create their own ecosystem. Why are they limited to some tropical coats, and why aren't temperate coasts also blanketed with a whole range of different 'mangrovian' ecosystems? If Earth doesn't offer us such a spectacle, could Furaha have vast ribbon-like forests covering its coastlines? That's something I haven't worked out yet; I should probably first understand why this does not happen on Earth. So far, I suspect that the origin of Earth's land plants, stemming from freshwater organisms, has something to do with it, which begs the question how mangroves manage salt water. I will have to study that, but for this post I am more interested in how they withstand waves.                          

Click to enlarge; copyright Gert van Dijk

Click to enlarge; copyright Gert van Dijk

Another plant aspect I once came up with was a desert ecosystem in which the local plants really went out of their way to fend off herbivores. Some plants produced caltrops, also known as crow's foot, among other names. Caltrops are the unpleasant pointy bits of iron strewn on the ground to make life difficult for the enemy's men and horses. In the case of Furahan caltrop plants, the spikes grew upward from the roots of some trees and shrubs.

Click to enlarge; from Wikipedia

Those Furahan root spikes looked -intentionally- like the top left caltrop in the image above, dating from 1505.

Other shrubs had nasty strong and very sharp thorns. Still, some herbivores, like the animal shown lying in the shade in the picture above, developed a string and tough carapax allowing them to move through the nasty shrubbery. The image is from an old oil painting that I later decided did not work  well, so it was delegated to the Forgotten Attic.        

But one plant species isn't on the painting. What if thorns that constantly touched a branch of the same plant would bend around that branch, clasping it firmly? If that would happen on many branches, the result would be a strong structure, one in which branches could not simply be pushed aside. This weblike structure would make life more difficult for herbivores, putting most of the plant outside their reach (well, until they evolved long tongues or the equivalent of pruning shears, of course).   

Click to enlarge; from Wikipedia
       
Another way to reach this webbed structure involves 'inosculation'. That isn't a concept I came up with for fun, but an existing word: here is the Wikipedia page on inosculation. According to Wikipedia, when tree trunks or roots rub against one another, the bark may wear off and the cambium, the live growing tissue of a tree, of the two touching parts may fuse and grow on from there, ultimately producing new bark around the touching area. This explanation centres on damage to the bark exposing the cambium. Grafting, the artificial variant of inosculation, also relies on would healing.    

Tree roots can certainly fuse, but roots do not move much, so I find it hard to believe that root inosculation must start with damage due to rubbing. This suggests that mere touch or pressure without movement seems sufficient to start inosculation. But roots and trunks can also press against stone, and such pressure does not seem to abrade the bark at all. In the end, it is often the stone that moves instead! Do trees recognise that they are touched by another part of themselves, and then allow or even favour inosculation? I found some evidence that some plants, like English ivy and strangler figs, readily from natural stem grafts (in this free paper). You can imagine that a climbing plant might benefit from a web structure. 

Click to enlarge; from Wikipedia
 

A strangler fig needs to be able to stand on its own stems when its victim dies, and firm connections between the stems are then quite beneficial. The image above, from the Wikipedia page on strangler figs, shows this fusion tendency quite clearly (but the page does not mention this).

That paper led to another stating that roots indeed graft naturally (here). One explanation for this tendency was that connected roots provide better anchorage (for other explanations, read the paper).

Well, well. It seems that some Earth plants indeed readily 'inosculate' to obtain a mechanical advantage! That is what I wanted, and as usual every time you think you had an original idea for a Speculative Biology project has already been tried by 'Nonspeculative Biology'...

All this makes me think that Furahan plants could do with more self-inosculation. The resulting cross-struts offer mechanical advantages that might help Furahan mangrovian plants to withstand the force of waves. In deserts, I can see plants preventing access to herbivores too.

-------------------------

For other posts on alien plants, start here or just search the blog for 'alien plants'. And for other posts of defunct paintings, start here. 

-----------------------

This is post #300! I also forgot to mention that the blog passed its 16th birthday in April, and that the 300 posts amassed a total of about 2680 comments. 

5 comments:

  1. Happy 16th Birthday, 300th, and 2680th! Enjoy, great Furaha & wise Creator!

    >What if thorns that constantly touched a branch of the same plant would bend around that branch, clasping it firmly?
    Hmmm...I don't know if it happens with thorns, but it does happen with other parts - think of how pea plants (and tomatoes, i think) cling to poles and other things in gardens.

    If I were to guess why trees fuse/graft to other trees, but not to rocks that may touch them in the same way...my hunch is that the rock gives no response of its own, aside from slow erosion & wear at best...while the trees at least encounter nutrients and immune responses.

    >for this post I am more interested in how they withstand waves.
    Hm...possibly because of how spread out the mangrove becomes, thanks to all the branches sending out additional roots/struts for support. (I think figs do something similar without going near water)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just saw this today, and it made me do some pondering about the centaurization of various clades on Furaha: https://youtu.be/YE3cuIEMccM?si=gG-OxhrDEMF6BJiO (contrary to the title, it doesn't explain how praying mantises came to be, but it does make mention of some curious questions that are under investigation - such as if each ecomorph has its own hunting style, whether related or not)

    have a great day, everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keenir (first post) Thank you. Perhaps thorns are indeed not the best starting point for grasping shoots, because their original purpose requires them to be stiff. Still, it should not be impossible for some thorns to grow before they stiffen, providing a window for repurposing.
    I have been looking at the type of chicl signal you mention, but could not find anything. Then again, i have not focused much on 'grafting' yet.
    As for how mangroves acte as wave breakers, I found conflicting papers: some say that you would need hundreds of meters of mangrove to break waves a bit, while others claim that -shorter- mangrove stands saved many villages in a 2004 storm. I found very little on the physics of it all. There must be more...

    Keenir (second post): Interesting video. Before I looked at it, I thought, given the title, that the video was about whether all mantises have a common ancestor (monophyletic) or whether their centaurism evolved more than once (polyphyletic). I had a quick look at that and found that they are monophyletic (here is an earlier paper https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00263.x and here is a more recent one https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00379271.2018.1556567)
    The video describes 'ecomorphs', a term new to me, describing that mantises that mimick the same object in different parts of the world look like one another, so an Asian leaf-mimic would resemble a leaf-mimic from another part of the world. That seems a very good example of convergent evolution. If you think about it, camouflage and mimicry must be very efficient drivers of convergent evolution.
    Furahan hexapods carnivores show centaurism and resemble mantises, although they were originally inspired by mantis shrimps. These were monophyletic too https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610894/, so I now decided that hexapods 'centauric' predators were monophyletic too...

    ReplyDelete
  4. ah...apologies.
    I actually *assumed* the existence of such signals...given that plants don't merge that promptly either, perhaps its not actually there. :)
    Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Keenir: I also thought that the mechanism by which various tree roots merge ('self grafting') would be known, but I just spent half an hour on google scholar and it does not seem to be the case. Observations that tree roots readily fuse have been made for centuries, even involving roots from different plant species. I found a 1966 paper describing detailed studies in figs on which tissues respond when and where. A review of graft compatibility for 2022 concluded that not much was known about this fundamental issue (large sums of money are involved in grafting grape vines).
    It seems likely that such roots somehow sense the nature of pressure; a chemical clue is probably involved, but that's about it...

    ReplyDelete

Please leave a message if you find any of this of interest.